"You've Caught the NET!"

head_left_image

POST-CLOSE POSSESSION - Do You Use It?

Hey, folks - want your opinion on something, and would like to see if you use it.

Here in Chicago, I have found that negotiating a contract for sale, on behalf of my Listing Clients, with a few days to perhaps a month of post-close possession in their old house or condo often works wonders!

Sellers hesitant to list until they find new place see post-close possession as a way to ensure they will not have to move twice. 

Those who need the funds from their sale in order to unfreeze their equity to buy a new home (most sellers these days - yes?) no longer have to be forced to close on the SALE in the morning, pray it FUNDS IN TIME, and then running to the closing to their purchase, often in a different location - with all of their belongings in the back of a moving truck in the Title Company parking lot.

Using post-close possession, sellers can now return to their house, sale proceeds in hand, clean up, and move out on a more leisurely, sane basis.  Even if the closing for the sale and the closing for the purchase are scheduled on the same day - the furniture remains in the old house, not in the truck outside.  Much Stress Alleviated!

Here in Illinois, it is customary for the seller to have a "Possession Escrow" of between one and two percent of the purchase price of the home placed in escrow, held usually by the listing office, to ensure they will vacate the property in a timely manner, according to the post-close possession agreement. 

The seller would pay a per-diem equal to 1/30 of the buyer's actual mortgage amount, plus taxes, homeowner assessments, and insurance, for each day in post-close possession.  The total rent-back amount is usually written in the form of a personal check at closing - many lenders refuse to allow it shown on the HUD-1.

Until possession is actually tendered, the buyer pays for all utility payments on his old place.  He also retains homeowners insurance in case there is some casualty during the possession period (of course, the buyer also has their own homeowners insurance - which company actually pays in the unfortunate event of a casualty is a matter of discussion between the insurers).

The buyer does not have the right to enter their new home until after the possession period.  They also retain the right of a final "pre-possession" walk through, in addition to the usual pre-closing walk through, to make sure the exiting homeowner has not caused any damage to the property during the post-possession period.

Any drawbacks?  Sure, they are possible!

The seller can refuse to vacate on time.  In this case, Illinois practice calls for 1/15 of the Possession Escrow held to be given to the buyer per late day - as a penalty.  This penalty could be sizable - perhaps $500 per day, or more.  Strong monetary incentive to leave on time!

Or, the seller can damage something in their old place.  Again, the possession escrow, as well as language in the post-possession agreement which buyer and seller sign together at the closing table, cover this possibility.

Further, there can be some mechanical breakdown in the home, or an insurable loss.  Again, the post-possession agreement covers this eventuality well.

Here in Chicago, there are more than a few agents, and a small number of Real Estate Attorneys, that become quite resistant to this little Post Possession tool, out of concern about these risks.  They hesitate to agree - without considerable discussion.

However, Dean's Team Chicago handles over a dozen post-close possession agreements each year, for going on 15 years now.  Never had a problem!

What's your local practice and experience on post-possession agreements?  Please share - the good, the bad, and any ugly!

DEAN & DEAN'S TEAM CHICAGO

Comments

It's very common here in Lansing.  Rent-back based upon the same as yours.  We occasionally get a buyer who objects and won't close without immediate possession.  When I represent the seller I always recommend that they stay at least 3-5 days after closing.  Some sellers cannot close on their new home until we close on their existing home and therefore cannot be out at closing.  I have had buyers back out at closing and the seller has moved out.  Not a good situation for the seller.

Posted by Jeff Thornton ABR CRB CRS CSP e-Pro GRI over 3 years ago

Although I had never heard of this (or like many many things, I've forgoten it) I like the idea. It sounds like you have all the bases covered in case they damage the place or as you mention "refuse to leave". Thanks for the thought.

Bob

Posted by Bob "RealMan" Timm (Oak Park Realty) over 3 years ago

It appears to be a great concept. In this ever changin industry, there truly is never a deal done until you walk away with checks in hand (and even then. . . who knows).

My brother(my listing specialist) and I were just discussing this today. It is extremely uncustomary in our parts, however we were trying to devise a working model to put in place to further give our seller's some security.

I will definitely pass this along. Great Post.

Posted by Keller Williams Realty of Plant City-The McGrath Group over 3 years ago

  Bob,  I use this to great effect especially when there are more than one offer in play.  But I don't want too many other agents to know this.....  Now look what you did....thanks a lot!!!!

Posted by Kim Harris-Broker/Owner/Sound Realty (Sound Realty) over 3 years ago

I recommend a post settlement occupancy for my sellers if they are buying another home in the area. It gives them one less thing to do on settlement day (moving) and eliminates the panic of back to back settlements and hoping that there are no delays in the funding of the first settlement. In most cases the rent back is less that the cost of a hotel for my client.

Posted by Rich Mielke, REALTOR, Frederick Maryland Real Estate (REMAX Results, Frederick MD) over 3 years ago

This blog does not allow anonymous comments